JCapper ratings tend to have a different balance for example, if using the program side by side with both file types, the Late ratings generated with BRIS tend to be way different than those generated by JCapper. Players who use other programs may find this useful for offering another view of a race.īRIS vs JCapper: The program was written to use BRIS files, and its ratings are probably better-balanced to the relative ratings of that file type. A user who looks for plays with value (overlays) can probably make a profit. While it finds a lot of short-priced horses, it also finds its fair share of longer-prices. The player can use the full-card listing buttons and create his/her spot plays from that.Īs for performance, the program has its good and bad days, like any other program. There are also a handful of spot plays built in. There is a lot of information in the output. It has a proprietary power rating and can also do a full-card list of the top E1, E2, Late, and within 2.5 lengths finish. The program itself accepts BRIS single files, Multicaps, and JCapper files. In my opinion, the view is valid, while not being the final word, and it is useful if it's viewed in that regard. It provides a different view than other programs do. What the program does do is concentrate on its focus areas, and it does that well. Those who want a fuller-featured program might try HTR, HSH, or JCapper itself. It focuses on recent speed and pace, with a few one-click spot plays tossed in. Understand that this isn't a magic winning machine. BRIS files work better, but JCapper files also work well. I wondered how the program would do with BRIS files, so I tested it with both. Since I decided to use the program, I sent him the $35 anyway fair is fair. The program did take JCapper files, and they didn't do badly.
When I emailed Greg, asking if the program accepted JCapper files, he sent me a free copy, no strings attached, so I could find out.
0 kommentar(er)
